Wednesday, September 8, 2010

SQR 2

Daniel Garcia


Eng 1320/1301.158

Trang Phan

Summary:

Sometimes when we make an essay, and we read it to our friend or teachers they give us an advise to support and make our essay much richer than it was before. These technique is very useful for all writers, in these process you can learn new languague, new facts and hear someone else opinion about the topic your talking, and as a result you’ll get more information and your work will be more complete. Response to peer’s draft is all too typical of the way untrained secondary students give feedback on each othe’s drafts during response group. One technique it’s called PQP(Praise-Question-Polish), this technique helps students focus on the task at hand as well as maintain a positive attitude toward the critique process. This technique requires group members to take a turn reading their drafts aloud as the other students follow along with copies. The number of members depends on your attitude, you can be in a total class, small group, or follow-up. In each different way, the experience changes and varies the way you learn. The type of group you select depends in your personality, because sometimes writers like to ear constructive critics or maybe the writer doesn’t like it. Your attitude to peer response got to be positive.

Question:

How is PQP technique described in the article? Why is it important to have Praise-Question-Poilish parts?

Response:

The technique is completely described, the hole process, the benefits and requirements. This technique is very important and usefull for all writers because it helps focus on the task at hand as well as maintain a positive attitude toward the critique process. These technique is made to help students each other, and hear someone else opinion in a healthy way. They also learn new facts and make they draft more complete. The PQP is a useful tool and makes betters drafts in a healthy enviroment.

2 comments:

  1. I did like the way your summary covered most of the article although your response needed some more elaboration. You should try to elaborate your response just a bit more.

    ReplyDelete
  2. thanks i will try to make it more elaborate next time

    ReplyDelete